Advancing Constitutional Principles in the Age of AI
The Institute for Constitutional AI Law
An independent center for research, education, and public dialogue on the constitutional future of artificial intelligence.
The Institute for Constitutional AI Law is an independent center for research, education, and public dialogue exploring how artificial intelligence and emerging technologies are reshaping law, constitutional governance, and access to justice. We bring together lawyers, judges, technologists, academics, policymakers, and innovators to help ensure that technological progress strengthens the rule of law and serves the public good.
The Institute for Constitutional AI Law
Founded by Michelle May O'Neil, J.D.
Frisco, Texas
[email protected]
Mission
Advancing Constitutional Principles in the Age of AI

The Institute for Constitutional AI Law is an independent think tank advancing constitutional principles in an age of technological transformation. We bring together leaders from law, technology, government, academia, and industry to examine the questions that will shape the future of society and help ensure that innovation strengthens liberty, justice, and the rule of law.
We believe the future of technology will not be determined by innovation alone. It will be determined by the principles that govern its use. Our mission is to shape that future.

Strategic priorities
Shaping the Conversation
The constitutional questions surrounding artificial intelligence and emerging technologies will shape law and society for generations to come. The Institute is committed to advancing thoughtful dialogue, practical ideas, and principled leadership in the areas where technological innovation and constitutional governance intersect.
Constitutional AI
Examining how constitutional principles including due process, free speech, equal protection, privacy, and individual liberty, apply as artificial intelligence becomes integrated into our legal institutions and daily lives.
Emerging Technologies
Examining the constitutional implications of technologies beyond artificial intelligence, including quantum computing, robotics, digital identity, autonomous systems, and future innovations.
Access to Justice
Advancing ideas that expand meaningful access to legal systems through responsible innovation.
Judicial Innovation
Helping courts thoughtfully adopt emerging technologies while preserving fairness, independence, and public trust.
Technology Governance
Promoting principled frameworks for the responsible governance of artificial intelligence and emerging technologies.
Decision Intelligence
Exploring how AI-assisted decision-making affects human judgment, institutional responsibility, procedural fairness, and public confidence in legal and public institutions.

Research Initiatives
Democratization of Intelligence
Artificial intelligence is redistributing knowledge, expertise, judgment, and decision-making capabilities historically concentrated within professions and institutions. The Institute studies the legal and constitutional consequences of that shift, including access to justice, professional regulation, individual autonomy, institutional authority, and the governance of increasingly capable consumer AI.
Global Justice Intelligence Project
An international study of how justice systems are integrating artificial intelligence across citizen access, legal information, decision support, court administration, prosecutorial functions, judicial assistance, and adjudication. The project maps how legal intelligence is being distributed between individuals and institutions and asks how that redistribution changes meaningful access to justice, the exercise of judgment, and human responsibility.
AI & Meaningful Access to Justice
Examining whether AI can narrow the gap between access to legal information and access to legal judgment. This work studies self-represented litigants, consumer legal AI, court restrictions, professional regulation, reliability, disclosure, and the constitutional and rule-of-law implications of AI becoming a practical means of participation in the justice system.
Human Identity in the AI Era
Examining ownership, authenticity, control, and economic use of human identity as voice, likeness, biometrics, data, predictive profiles, digital replicas, autonomous agents, and tokenized identity assets become increasingly programmable and transferable. The project asks whether existing legal regimes can adequately govern identity when different layers of the human self are controlled by different actors under different laws.
AI Governance at the Point of Use
Studying how broad principles of responsible AI become operational rules for actual human use. The project focuses on tool selection, data use, confidentiality, verification, supervision, disclosure, accountability, and how institutions can evaluate the next AI tool without rewriting governance from scratch.The Institute translates this research into practical governance frameworks, educational programs, and implementation models for the legal profession and justice institutions.
Upcoming Work
Building the Conversation
The Institute is in its founding year. Our initial work is focused on publishing thoughtful commentary, developing practical frameworks, and convening conversations about constitutional law and emerging technologies. As the Institute grows, these efforts will expand into broader educational programs, publications, and public dialogue.
Near-term priorities:
Annual Constitutional AI Report
Global Justice Intelligence comparative map and field notes
Selected law review and scholarly publications
Continuing legal education and AI governance programs for the legal profession
Constitutional commentary and essays
Public dialogue and international convenings on emerging technologies
Practical AI governance frameworks for law firms and legal organizations
Leadership
About the Founder
Michelle May O’Neil is an attorney, legal technology founder, researcher, and former senior shareholder and co-founder of O’Neil Wysocki, now leading the Institute for Constitutional AI Law, Concierra Technology, and Concierra Legal. A Board Certified Texas family law and appellate attorney with more than three decades in practice, she has handled 195+ appellate matters, 55 matters before the Texas Supreme Court, and 37 jury trials. She is admitted to the bar of the United States Supreme Court, where she has handled one filing. She served as adjunct professor at Baylor University School of Law.
Her work sits at the intersection of law, technology, and institutional change that the Institute was founded to explore. It asks how is artificial intelligence reshaping legal practice, professional responsibility, and access to justice? She is the creator of the Identity Stack, a seven-layer model for governing identity in the AI-era, debuted at SXSW 2026 and taught at the Stanford Graduate School of Business; a featured voice on ethics and professionalism at the Texas Center for Legal Ethics; and author of the forthcoming The Fifth Move. Her commentary on the constitutional questions of emerging technology appears through the Institute and in her essays on Substack.
Michelle O'Neil founded the Institute on a conviction three decades of practice made unavoidable: the future of technology will be determined not by innovation alone, but by the principles that govern its use.
O’Neil’s current research focuses on the democratization of intelligence and the institutional consequences of AI capabilities moving directly into the hands of individuals. She leads the Institute’s Global Justice Intelligence Project. She is also developing her Groundswell Thesis, a framework for understanding how bottom-up consumer adoption of AI can force legal and institutional change before formal governance catches up.

Insights
Join the Conversation
The Institute publishes commentary, essays, and analysis exploring constitutional law, artificial intelligence, and emerging technologies. Subscribe to receive new publications as they are released.
contact
Contact Us.
Whether you're interested in research collaboration, speaking, AI governance programs, institutional partnerships, or exploring new ideas, we'd like to hear from you.
The Institute for Constitutional AI Law is an independent institute advancing research, education, and practical frameworks at the intersection of artificial intelligence, law, justice, governance, and human rights. Content is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Nothing on this website creates an attorney-client relationship.© 2026 Concierra Media. All rights reserved.PrivacyThe Institute for Constitutional AI Law respects your privacy. This website may collect information you voluntarily provide through contact forms, email, program inquiries, event registrations, or other communications, including your name, organization, email address, telephone number, and message content.The Institute may use this information to respond to inquiries, communicate about research, publications, programs, events, governance initiatives, speaking engagements, or other Institute activities, and to administer its operations.The website and its service providers may also collect limited technical information, such as browser type, device information, IP address, referring pages, and website usage data, for security, analytics, performance, and website improvement.The Institute does not sell personal information. Information may be shared with service providers supporting Institute operations, when reasonably necessary to provide requested services or programs, or when required by law.This website may contain links or embedded content from third-party platforms. The Institute is not responsible for the privacy practices of those third parties.Questions concerning privacy may be directed to [email protected].Terms of UseThe Institute for Constitutional AI Law provides this website, its research, commentary, educational materials, governance frameworks, and related content for informational and educational purposes.Nothing on this website constitutes legal advice, creates an attorney-client relationship, or should be relied upon as a substitute for advice from qualified legal or other professional counsel.Participation in Institute programs, workshops, cohorts, governance assessments, research initiatives, or advisory engagements does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Institute, Michelle May O'Neil, Concierra Legal, or any related entity unless expressly established in a separate written agreement.The Institute's research, commentary, frameworks, models, educational materials, graphics, and other original content are protected by applicable intellectual property laws and may not be reproduced, distributed, modified, or used commercially without permission unless otherwise stated.The Institute may discuss emerging technologies, legal developments, governance practices, and evolving institutional approaches. Because these subjects change rapidly, the Institute does not warrant that all information will remain current, complete, or applicable to any particular situation.Links to third-party websites and references to third-party organizations, products, courts, governments, or technologies are provided for informational purposes and do not necessarily constitute endorsement.This website and its content are provided on an “as is” and “as available” basis. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Institute disclaims warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, availability, or fitness of website content for any particular purpose.These Terms of Use may be updated as the Institute's research, programs, and activities evolve.Last updated: August 2026


